Soapbox for a midget Aussie

Modern Art = Shit


By kaitee - Posted on 23 September 2008

Imagine for a moment if you will, that you are a passionate art student. Your entire being centres on creating one spectacular work of art that will define your career and indeed your whole existence. You spend years refining your technique, studying the masters of the ages, experimenting with colours and mediums and searching deep within your soul for the tiniest spark of inspiration.

 

*SPARK!* You have been inspired.

 

 
Now, providing that you haven’t died from malnutrition from living up to the starving artist stereotype, overdosed on drugs, been infested by colonies of bacteria from not washing your hair or clothes for ten years, choked on your own self importance or died of boredom from listening to one too many existential debates, you are ready to embark on your journey to fame and fortune.

 

It is the time for careful preparation; you plan your stunning masterpiece, select your canvas, lay out your brushes and paints and then it is time. You pick up your brush and years of intense study and a lifetime of passion comes to life.

 

As you paint, you think about the greats.

 

Boticelli:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rembrandt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michelangelo:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And then…

There is you:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am no artist. I am no critic. But this painting is, for lack of a better word, fucking atrocious. How in the world does it deserve 25K and a 3 month stint in a Parisian art school? This looks like something my 2 year old cousin would finger paint at kindergarten. The crap that my old flatmate and I painted when we trashed some furniture, drank a few bottles of passion pop and decided to use what was once a desk as a canvas had more artistic merit than this.

 

The artist describes her style; "I am highly influenced by colour, the experience of creating line and the effect of random mark making." I am of the firm belief that this is artist talk (making stupid statements in fancy language that you pull out of your arse trying to make yourself sound like some kind of intellectual deep thinker) for “basically no thought went into this at all and I’m a no talent poseur”.

 

People need to stop paying money for this crap, because by these standards, even a blind dog could be classified as an artist. It’s a wonder we aren’t all trying to dig out the shit we made in preschool and trying to flog it off on ebay as some kind of contemporary art genius.

 

I have a rabid dislike of pompous jerks who call themselves artists when in fact they do nothing more than plop a few colours around in random patterns and then make wanky statements about the meaning behind it; “life is all about random chance, this painting signifies my own internal struggle trying to overcome the cards that fate has dealt me”.

 

Oh and 90% of them don’t wash their hair, they smell bad and spend too much time smoking pot and debating political science to realise their head is up their arse and everyone is wishing painful and ironic death upon them.
 

One of my girlfriends experienced this type of bs while she was in uni. She was a skilled artist who took time to make everything she drew as detailed as possible. Even though I didn't like some of the subjects she worked on, One which was meats, It was on point.

The day that insulted her most was when her art space was pushed to the side because another arist needed more space for her work. What was the work you might ask? Pieces of string hung on a wall by pins........

The art community needs to stop trying to credit these people with thinking outside the box when their art is on par with an animal with a paintbrush being taught to throw paint on a canvas in random patterns. That animal art is a whole other topic on it's own.

One of the most pointless pieces I saw was a collection of I think 100 canvases. Each with a basic black fonted number. You'd see people paying thousands of dollars just for a number 1 or 59. It's a sad time for art when advertisements in magazines have more quality in them than those pieces in art gallerys.

You know, I hadn't actually thought of it  but you're right, a lot of advertising really does have better quality artwork. Damn. That's rather upsetting.

T-Shirts are another new day canvas too. Many artists make thousands $20 at a time. Why would they bother getting put down by some 30 year old art critic who is out of touch and narrowminded. You are more likely to have someone be suprised by your work via a moving gallery than by having it on a wall where everyone already has their mind on being judgemental.

Oh my God, THANK YOU for this article. Bout time someone said it. Jesus...

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options



User login

Navigation

Recent comments